Marshall v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Marshall v. State

490 P.2d 1056, 87 Nev. 536, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 471

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 22, 1971

Docket6505

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 490 P.2d 1056 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marshall v. State, 490 P.2d 1056, 87 Nev. 536, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 471 (Neb. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Marshall, appellant-defendant, was tried before a jury and *537 found guilty of burglary, a violation of NRS 205.060. Appellant asserts on appeal that there was insufficient evidence adduced at his trial to support his conviction. It is a long established rule of this court that upon appeal we must sustain a conviction if the record contains substantial evidence to support the conviction. We have reviewed the record and find therein substantial evidence to support the appellant’s conviction and prove each and every element of the crime with which he was charged. Coffins v. State, 87 Nev. 436, 488 P.2d 544 (1971); Graham v. State, 86 Nev. 290, 467 P.2d 1016 (1970); McGuire v. State, 86 Nev. 262, 468 P.2d 12 (1970); Cross v. State, 85 Nev. 580, 460 P.2d 151 (1969).

We have reviewed and considered the other assertion of error and find it to be without merit.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Marshall, appellant-defendant, was tried before a jury and *537 found guilty of burglary, a violation of NRS 205.060. Appellant asserts on appeal that there was insufficient evidence adduced at his trial to support his conviction. It is a long established rule of this court that upon appeal we must sustain a conviction if the record contains substantial evidence to support the conviction. We have reviewed the record and find therein substantial evidence to support the appellant’s conviction and prove each and every element of the crime with which he was charged. Coffins v. State, 87 Nev. 436, 488 P.2d 544 (1971); Graham v. State, 86 Nev. 290, 467 P.2d 1016 (1970); McGuire v. State, 86 Nev. 262, 468 P.2d 12 (1970); Cross v. State, 85 Nev. 580, 460 P.2d 151 (1969).

We have reviewed and considered the other assertion of error and find it to be without merit.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 P.2d 1056, 87 Nev. 536, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-nev-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack