Williams v. State
66 S.E. 809, 7 Ga. App. 336, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Ga. App. 629 →
Opinion
The testimony makes it very clear that there was a burglary, and that the defendant was the burglar. The requests to charge, so far as they were legal and pertinent, were fairly covered by the general charge. No sufficient reason appears for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 66 S.E. 809, 7 Ga. App. 336, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 283 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
66 S.E. 809 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.