Williams v. State

58 S.E. 549, 2 Ga. App. 394, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 388

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1907·No. 526·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. In the absence of any proof to the contrary, the jury ire a burglary case are authorized to infer that a building described as the; “home” of the prosecutor is a dwelling-house.

2. The evidence amply warranted the verdict rendered, and no reversible-error of law is assigned. Judgment affirmed.

Submitted July 17, Decided July 25, 1907. Gordon & Charlton, for plaintiff in error. W. W. Osborne, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. In the absence of any proof to the contrary, the jury ire a burglary case are authorized to infer that a building described as the; “home” of the prosecutor is a dwelling-house.

2. The evidence amply warranted the verdict rendered, and no reversible-error of law is assigned. Judgment affirmed.

Submitted July 17, Decided July 25, 1907. Gordon & Charlton, for plaintiff in error. W. W. Osborne, solicitor-general, contra.

Williams v. State, 58 S.E. 549, 2 Ga. App. 394, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 388 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

58 S.E. 549 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Worthen v. State

823 S.E.2d 291 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2019)

Opinion

Related