Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

39 S.E. 294, 113 Ga. 704, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 356
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 Ga. 693 →
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 17, 1901·Published

Opinion

Little, J.

The evidence fully sustained the verdict of the jury. The error of the trial judge in inaccurately stating the contentions of the defendant, taken in connection with all the instructions given, was manifestly not harmful to-the defendant, and therefore affords no legal cause for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Du/ncan & Duncan and JR. JSf. J&oltzclaw, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and William, Brunson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 39 S.E. 294, 113 Ga. 704, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 356 (Ga. 1901).

39 S.E. 294 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.