Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Williams v. State

39 S.E. 294, 113 Ga. 704, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 356

DecidedJuly 17, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 39 S.E. 294 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 39 S.E. 294, 113 Ga. 704, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 356 (Ga. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

The evidence fully sustained the verdict of the jury. The error of the trial judge in inaccurately stating the contentions of the defendant, taken in connection with all the instructions given, was manifestly not harmful to-the defendant, and therefore affords no legal cause for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Du/ncan & Duncan and JR. JSf. J&oltzclaw, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and William, Brunson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little, J.

The evidence fully sustained the verdict of the jury. The error of the trial judge in inaccurately stating the contentions of the defendant, taken in connection with all the instructions given, was manifestly not harmful to-the defendant, and therefore affords no legal cause for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Du/ncan & Duncan and JR. JSf. J&oltzclaw, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and William, Brunson, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.E. 294, 113 Ga. 704, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-ga-1901.