Williams v. State
941 So. 2d 445, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17902, 2006 WL 2959349
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2006·No. No. 3D06-1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for post conviction relief. Defendant’s claim is time-barred and is not newly discovered evidence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 941 So. 2d 445, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17902, 2006 WL 2959349 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
941 So. 2d 445 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
121 So. 3d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)