Williams v. State
858 So. 2d 1273, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17564, 2003 WL 22715700
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2003·No. No. 3D02-3357·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the evidence does not support the conclusion that, as alleged, the appellant deliberately falsified statements in his post-conviction motions, the order adjudicating him in contempt for doing so is reversed with directions to dismiss the contempt proceeding. See Brown v. State, 579 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 858 So. 2d 1273, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17564, 2003 WL 22715700 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
858 So. 2d 1273 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newman v. Newman
858 So. 2d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)