Williams v. State
939 So. 2d 1073, 2006 WL 2927224
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 870 So. 2d 71 →
Opinion
THEODORE WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004); Sigafoos v. State, 825 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Cala v. State, 854 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Middleton v. State, 721 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
FULMER, C.J., and VILLANTI and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 939 So. 2d 1073, 2006 WL 2927224 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
939 So. 2d 1073 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. State
887 So. 2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Sigafoos v. State
825 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Middleton v. State
721 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cala v. State
854 So. 2d 840 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)