Williams v. State

727 So. 2d 1095, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2467, 1999 WL 110826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1999·No. No. 98-1541·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Williams appeals that portion of his judgment that stated:

X The court allows unforfeited gain time previously awarded on the above case/ [1096]*1096count (Gain time may be forfeited by the Department of Corrections under section 944.28(1)).

Williams contends that another portion of the judgment properly awarded gain time to him and that the portion quoted above creates a conflict that should not have been included in his judgment. He argues that section 944.28(1) does not apply to his offenses because he committed them prior to October 1, 1989.

We agree with Williams that his gain time earned during the time he served his sentence on offenses committed prior to October 1, 1989 cannot be forfeited by the Department of Corrections and that the above quoted provision was erroneously included in his judgment. See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941, 942, n. 2 (Fla.1993). We vacate the portion of the judgment which includes the language quoted above.

JUDGMENT PARTIALLY VACATED.

COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 727 So. 2d 1095, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2467, 1999 WL 110826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

727 So. 2d 1095 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheeler v. State
744 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)