Williams v. State

711 So. 2d 1304, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5987, 1998 WL 279225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6589
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1998·No. No. 97-03804·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

Corey Williams raises several issues on appeal as a result of the judgment and sentence entered against him for attempted trafficking in cocaine and a felon in possession of a firearm. We deny relief as to the alleged errors in jury instructions, in rulings on the motions for judgment of acquittal, and in evidentiary rulings.

Although we affirm the conviction and sentence, the judgment must be corrected. Williams was convicted of attempted trafficking in cocaine. The judgment, however, recites only the trafficking statute, section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1995). The judgment should also refer to the general attempt statute, section 777.04, Florida Statutes (1995). See Cardi v. State, 685 So.2d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Therefore, this case is remanded for the correction of the judgment to include the general attempt statute. Williams’ presence is not required for this task.

Remanded for correction of the judgment.

FULMER and GREEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 711 So. 2d 1304, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5987, 1998 WL 279225 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

711 So. 2d 1304 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cardi v. State
685 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)