Williams v. State

659 So. 2d 366, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7107, 1995 WL 363382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 604 So. 2d 8
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 1995·No. No. 93-2527·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Williams’ appeal from conviction of exploitation of an aged person pursuant to section 415.111(5), Florida Statutes, and from convictions of two counts of grand theft and one count of petit theft. We reverse the appellant’s conviction for violation of section 415.111(5) and vacate the sentence therefor. Cuda v. State, 639 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1994) (finding this statutory subsection unconstitutional). See King v. State, 642 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We affirm, however, the trial court’s denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal as to the theft counts. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187, 189 (Fla. 1986). In light of our reversal of appellant’s conviction under section 415.111(5), Florida Statutes, appellant’s double jeopardy claim is moot.

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 659 So. 2d 366, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7107, 1995 WL 363382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 366 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuda v. State
639 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
State v. Law
559 So. 2d 187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
King v. State
642 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)