Williams v. State

663 So. 2d 672, 1995 WL 681744
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1995·No. 94-00037·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

663 So.2d 672 (1995)

Adolphus WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-00037.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 17, 1995.

Robert H. Dillinger, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant, Adolphus Williams, appeals his convictions for four counts of kidnapping. We affirm three of the convictions but reverse the conviction for the kidnapping of Lowell Johnson, Sr. As to that charge, the defendant was entitled to be discharged for violation of the speedy trial rule for the reasons explained in this court's opinion in the appeal of Williams' codefendant, Adams v. State, 659 So.2d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). See also Critton v. State, 659 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

We reverse the defendant's conviction on the charge of kidnapping Lowell Johnson, Sr., and remand with directions that the conviction be vacated and the defendant be discharged on this count. Because the defendant's sentencing scoresheet must be recalculated, we also remand for resentencing on the remaining three convictions which are affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 663 So. 2d 672, 1995 WL 681744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 672 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hebb v. State
714 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)