Williams v. State

646 So. 2d 264, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11495, 1994 WL 665403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 591 So. 2d 948
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1994·No. No. 93-03713·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising a possible scoresheet issue in which we find no merit. In accord with our duty under In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), we have reviewed the record in its entirety and find that alcohol-related conditions of probation were imposed in the trial court’s written order which were not pronounced at sentencing. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence of probation and remand so that the unpronounced, nonstatutory conditions may be stricken. Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 646 So. 2d 264, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11495, 1994 WL 665403 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

646 So. 2d 264 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re Anders Briefs
581 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Tillman v. State
592 So. 2d 767 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)