Williams v. State

619 So. 2d 398, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6040, 1993 WL 179442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 So. 2d 838
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1993·No. No. 92-02055·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwight A. Williams entered into a negotiated plea of guilty to four separate charges and violation of probation. Due to a scrivener’s error, the judgment incorrectly indicates that Williams pled nolo conten-dere. The convictions and sentences received by Williams are proper and we affirm the trial court’s actions, however, the clerical error must be corrected. See Wright v. State, 568 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court to allow correction of the clerical error so the judgment will properly reflect that the appellant entered a plea of guilty.

Affirmed and remanded, with directions.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 619 So. 2d 398, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6040, 1993 WL 179442 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

619 So. 2d 398 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
568 So. 2d 1313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)