Williams v. State

563 So. 2d 1136, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5361, 1990 WL 102722
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 516 So. 2d 975
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1990·No. No. 90-566·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ron E. Williams appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel and three procedural errors. We affirm.

With regard to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the motion is facially insufficient, i.e., the allegations of deficiencies are too general. See Williams v. State, 553 So.2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The remaining allegations could and should have been raised on direct appeal, and therefore cannot be raised in a motion for post-conviction relief. See, e.g., Demps v. State, 515 So.2d 196 (Fla. 1987). Based on the foregoing, we find that the motion was properly denied.

Affirmed.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 563 So. 2d 1136, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5361, 1990 WL 102722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 1136 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
553 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Demps v. State
515 So. 2d 196 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)