Williams v. State

618 So. 2d 367, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5988, 1993 WL 169159
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 So. 2d 838
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1993·No. No. 91-01973·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

This cause returns to us pursuant to the mandate of the Florida Supreme Court issued May 3,1993, in State v. Williams, 616 So.2d 51 (Fla.1993), for reconsideration in the light of the recent decision in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We vacate our previous opinion and substitute the following.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing appellant to a mandatory minimum term for battery on a person over the age of 65. The minimum mandatory provisions of section 784.08, Florida Statutes, only apply to aggravated batteries.

Appellant’s contentions concerning habitual offender findings here are without merit. State v. Rucker, supra.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, but reverse and remand the sentence for proceedings consistent herewith.

BOOTH, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 618 So. 2d 367, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5988, 1993 WL 169159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

618 So. 2d 367 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rucker
613 So. 2d 460 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
State v. Williams
616 So. 2d 51 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)