Williams v. State

167 So. 2d 795
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1964·No. No. 63-673·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule #1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

The appellant originally pleaded not guilty and subsequently, when represented by counsel of his own choosing, changed this plea to guilty. Therefore, he was entitled to no relief. See: Sardinia v. State, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 328; Anderson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 887.

The other two grounds of the petition are not sufficient for a collateral attack under Criminal Procedure Rule #1. See: Milton v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 147 So.2d 137; Wooten v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 305; Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 224; Jackson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 166 So.2d 194, 195.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 167 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

167 So. 2d 795 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. State
210 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Swindle v. State
202 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Paschal v. State
201 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Raudabaugh v. State
197 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Williams v. State
186 So. 2d 279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Duff v. State
173 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)