Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sardinia v. State

Sardinia v. State

162 So. 2d 328, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 31, 1964
DocketNo. 63-754
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 162 So. 2d 328 (Sardinia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sardinia v. State, 162 So. 2d 328, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from a denial of an application for relief pursuant to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm.

It appears, from the transcript of the trial proceedings, that the appellant had counsel at the time of the trials which resulted in the convictions involved here. Therefore, having had counsel at the time of his trials [even though he may have plead guilty] there is no merit to his contention that he was denied due process because counsel could have made appropriate motions to have the pleas of guilty set aside. See: § 909.13, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 554, and authorities cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sardinia v. State
168 So. 2d 674 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Williams v. State
167 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Swarthout v. State
165 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Smith v. State
168 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Poss v. State
169 So. 2d 845 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 2d 328, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sardinia-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.