Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sardinia v. State

Sardinia v. State

162 So. 2d 328, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 1964·No. No. 63-754·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from a denial of an application for relief pursuant to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm.

It appears, from the transcript of the trial proceedings, that the appellant had counsel at the time of the trials which resulted in the convictions involved here. Therefore, having had counsel at the time of his trials [even though he may have plead guilty] there is no merit to his contention that he was denied due process because counsel could have made appropriate motions to have the pleas of guilty set aside. See: § 909.13, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 554, and authorities cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sardinia v. State, 162 So. 2d 328, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

162 So. 2d 328 (Sardinia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sardinia v. State
168 So. 2d 674 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Williams v. State
167 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Swarthout v. State
165 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Smith v. State
168 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Poss v. State
169 So. 2d 845 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)