Williams v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

145 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 697

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 1933

Docket6 Div. 320.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 So. 927 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 145 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 697 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

It is evident that the appeal in this case was for delay. The appellant when arraigned in the lower court interposed a plea of guilty to the offense of violating the prohibition law upon which he was adjudged guilty, but, notwithstanding this, he appealed from the judgment of conviction. He had this right, however. Wright’s Case, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316.

The record upon which this appeal is rested is regular and without error, and the cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

It is evident that the appeal in this case was for delay. The appellant when arraigned in the lower court interposed a plea of guilty to the offense of violating the prohibition law upon which he was adjudged guilty, but, notwithstanding this, he appealed from the judgment of conviction. He had this right, however. Wright’s Case, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316.

The record upon which this appeal is rested is regular and without error, and the cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-alactapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack