Williams v. State
564 So. 2d 477, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 868, 1990 WL 113252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 →
Opinion
The appellant’s attorney has filed a “no merit” brief, in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The appellant’s attorney has cited several possible issues and has included discussion thereon. However, after searching the record, the attorney has concluded that an appeal would be frivolous. The State and this court have also searched the record and find no error. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. See Rule 45B, A.R.App.P., and Anders, supra.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 564 So. 2d 477, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 868, 1990 WL 113252 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).
564 So. 2d 477 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)