Williams v. State

519 So. 2d 1375, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 37, 1988 WL 11643
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 26, 1988
Docket2 Div. 611
StatusPublished

This text of 519 So. 2d 1375 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. State, 519 So. 2d 1375, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 37, 1988 WL 11643 (Ala. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

McMILLAN, Judge.

This court informed the appellant’s counsel on January 4,1987, that he had not filed [1376]*1376a brief as required by the Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. No brief has been filed. The appellant is constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel, including the filing of an appellate brief, on the first appeal of right. Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 105 S.Ct. 830, 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985). This cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to appoint new appellate counsel.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evitts v. Lucey
469 U.S. 387 (Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 So. 2d 1375, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 37, 1988 WL 11643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-alacrimapp-1988.