Williams v. Smith
238 A.2d 457, 51 N.J. 161, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 153
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Schettino and Ha new an—6.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Smith, 238 A.2d 457, 51 N.J. 161, 1968 N.J. LEXIS 153 (N.J. 1968).
238 A.2d 457 (Williams v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Viviani v. Borough of Bogota
765 A.2d 1064 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Newark Superior Officers Ass'n v. City of Newark
486 A.2d 305 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Newark Superior Officers Ass'n v. Newark
455 A.2d 81 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Blair v. Erie Lackawanna Railway Co.
305 A.2d 446 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
State, in the Interest of Ln
263 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)