Williams v. Sizer
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6349
SCOTLAND E. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK SIZER, Commissioner; LEHRMAN DOTSON, Warden; KAREN GIBSON, Mail Clerk,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv- 01759-AMD)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scotland E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Williams v. Sizer, No. 1:06-cv-01759-AMD (D.
Md. Aug. 10, 2007; Feb. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Sizer (Williams v. Sizer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.