Williams v. Sizer

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2008·No. 08-6349·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6349

SCOTLAND E. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK SIZER, Commissioner; LEHRMAN DOTSON, Warden; KAREN GIBSON, Mail Clerk,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-cv- 01759-AMD)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scotland E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Williams v. Sizer, No. 1:06-cv-01759-AMD (D.

Md. Aug. 10, 2007; Feb. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Sizer, (4th Cir. 2008).

Williams v. Sizer (Williams v. Sizer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related