Williams v. Sizer

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Sizer

285 F. App'x 72

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2008·No. No. 08-6349·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Sizer, No. 1:06-cv-01759-AMD (D.Md. Aug. 10, 2007; Feb. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Sizer, No. 1:06-cv-01759-AMD (D.Md. Aug. 10, 2007; Feb. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. Sizer, 285 F. App'x 72 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

285 F. App'x 72 (Williams v. Sizer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related