Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Benton Williams, Jr.,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:24cv580
Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 6, 2024 (Doc. 11). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 11) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 11) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As a result, Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Permanent Injunction Prohibiting Repossession of Plaintiff’s Automobile” (Docs. 9 & 10) are DENIED as Moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.