Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided November 22, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00580·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Benton Williams, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:24cv580

Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 6, 2024 (Doc. 11). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 11) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 11) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As a result, Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Permanent Injunction Prohibiting Repossession of Plaintiff’s Automobile” (Docs. 9 & 10) are DENIED as Moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., (S.D. Ohio 2024).

Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (Williams v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related