Williams v. Pinkett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Pinkett

59 A.D.2d 573, 397 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 573 (Williams v. Pinkett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Pinkett, 59 A.D.2d 573, 397 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioner as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 8, 1977 for the public office of Council Member, 28th Councilmanic District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 1977, which, after a hearing, inter alia, declared the designating petitions to be invalid. Mary Pinkett cross-appeals from the said judgment insofar as it failed to dismiss petitioner’s validating petition on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A designating petition can only be signed by persons who are duly enrolled and registered voters at the time of the execution of the petition (Election Law, § 153, subd 7). The facts necessary to determine the cross appeal were not properly brought before this court. Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioner as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 8, 1977 for the public office of Council Member, 28th Councilmanic District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 1977, which, after a hearing, inter alia, declared the designating petitions to be invalid. Mary Pinkett cross-appeals from the said judgment insofar as it failed to dismiss petitioner’s validating petition on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A designating petition can only be signed by persons who are duly enrolled and registered voters at the time of the execution of the petition (Election Law, § 153, subd 7). The facts necessary to determine the cross appeal were not properly brought before this court. Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 573, 397 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-pinkett-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack