Williams v. Paramount Coal Co.

104 So. 753, 213 Ala. 281, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 278
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 28, 1925·No. 6 Div. 336.·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, X

The findings of fact being too meager to fully inform this court in respect to the previous weekly earnings of Tom Williams, the bill of exceptions is considered. Ex parte Mt. Carmel Coal Co., 209 Ala. 519, 96 So. 626. In Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803, Ex parte H. T. Smith Lumber Co., 206 Ala. 485, 90 So. 807, and Ex parte Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. (Greek’s Case), 207 Ala. 219, 92 So. 458, it was declared of adjudications under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Laws 1919, p. 206) that, where there is “any legal evidence to support the finding, such finding is conclusive, and no technical questions as to the admissibility of evidence will be here considered.” At the trial the evidence of the wife and Mr. Donaldson was before the court, and there was evidence on the part of the former to support the judgment rendered.

The costs were awarded within the terms of the statute. Gen. Acts 1919, p. 228.

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Paramount Coal Co., 104 So. 753, 213 Ala. 281, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 278 (Ala. 1925).

104 So. 753 (Williams v. Paramount Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tripple M. Homes, Inc. v. Pickens
248 So. 2d 139 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Shell Petroleum Corporation v. Lucas
169 So. 291 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Reed
137 So. 673 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Wetter Pipe Co. v. Williams
135 So. 172 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Woodward Iron Co. v. Dean
117 So. 52 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. House
116 So. 167 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Paramount Coal Co. v. Williams
108 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Gulf States Steel Co. v. Griffin
106 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Gulf States Steel Co. v. Witherspoon
106 So. 900 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Birmingham Slag Co. v. Johnson
106 So. 806 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Webb v. National Pipe & Foundry Co.
105 So. 693 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Ex Parte Big Four Coal Mining Co.
104 So. 764 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)