Birmingham Slag Co. v. Johnson

106 So. 806, 214 Ala. 131, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 165

• Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
• Decided: January 14, 1926
• Docket: 6 Div. 538.
• Status: Published

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

This is a compensation ease. The claim is prosecuted by Mrs. M. J. Johnson as the dependent mother of William M. Johnson, the deceased employee. The point of controversy is the amount of compensation allowed.

The trial court found the average weekly earnings of deceased to be $2S.55; that the average contribution to his mother’s support for some years prior to his death was $7 per week.

Touching actual dependency the court said:

“The court further finds from the evidence that Mrs. M. J. Johnson is a widow woman, and had no means of support other than what she earned from short period transient boarders, which was not enough to support her; that Mrs. M. J. Johnson was partially dependent upon her son for support.”

The judgment awarded the mother $7 per week for 300 weeks.

“ * * * partial dependents shall be entitled to receive only that proportion of the benefits provided for actual dependents which the average amount of the earnings regularly contributed by the deceased to such partial dependent, at and for a reasonable time immediately prior to the injury bore to the total income of the'dependent during the same time.” Code, § 7556.

The finding of facts is omissive in its failure to find the total income of the dependent. In such case we look to the bill of exceptions. Ex parte Paramount Coal Co. (Ala. Sup.) 104 So. 753; 1 Ex parte American Mine Owners Mutual, 20 Ala. App. 647, 104 So. 912.

It reasonably appears from the evidence of plaintiff, shown by bill of exceptions, that her income from the boarding house business during the year preceding decedent’s death, consumed in providing herself food, shelter 'and clothing, was $6 per week. This income, it appears, accrued by the aid of another son, who paid the rent on the joint residence of himself and mother and contributed to payment of grocery bills; but it may be treated, as it was treated by the court below, viz., as income from the boarding house business.

Applying the above quoted statute to the facts found by the trial court, aided by the bill of exceptions, we have the following factors: Total income of dependent, $13 per week. Amount contributed by deceased, $7 per week. Compensation to wholly dependent mother under section 7556, 25 per cent, of weekly earnings, in this case 25 per cent. of $28.55, viz., $7.14 per week. The amount to which the plaintiff is entitled by section 7556 is solvable by the following equation: 13:7 :: 7.14:(?). Upon solution the parenthetical number, found to be $3.85, represents tbe weekly compensation allowable under section 7556.

But the allowance is subject to the minimum limit fixed by section 7558. The mother’s income loss being in excess of $5 per week, she is entitled to be compensated at the rate of $5 per week for 300 weeks.

The judgment will be' here corrected reducing tbe allowance 'from $7 per week to $5 per week, and the attorney’s fee in like proportion.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 213 Ala. 281.