Williams v. Norris

176 F.3d 1089, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9059
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 14, 1999
Docket99-1743
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 176 F.3d 1089 (Williams v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Norris, 176 F.3d 1089, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9059 (8th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

176 F.3d 1089

Avery D. WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
Larry NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction;
Perry, Major, Chief of Security, North Central Unit; Steve
Lively, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, North Central Unit;
Larry May, Warden/Center Supervisor, North Central Unit;
David Guntharp, Grievance Administrator, Central Office, Appellees.

No. 99-1743.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 1999.
Decided May 14, 1999.

Avery D. Williams, argued, pro se.

Sara Merritt, Asst. Attorney General, Little Rock, AR, argued, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Avery D. Williams, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Williams had claimed that Arkansas Department of Correction officials violated his constitutional rights and his rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-2000bb-4, by imposing a grooming policy which prohibited Williams--a Rastafarian--from wearing his hair in "dreadlocks." We conclude the district court improperly granted defendants' motion to dismiss, as the record demonstrates that Williams's grievance had been denied by the Warden and the Assistant Director at the time the court ruled. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to allow Williams an opportunity to proceed on his claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. Bernice
D. Maryland, 2022
McKinney v. Carey
311 F.3d 1198 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Ahmed v. Dragovich
297 F.3d 201 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Howard Lee Leach v. Larry Norris
34 F. App'x 510 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Neal v. Goord
267 F.3d 116 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Jackson v. District of Columbia
254 F.3d 262 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F.3d 1089, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-norris-ca8-1999.