Avery Williams v. Larry Norris

176 F.3d 1089
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 14, 1999·No. 99-1743·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Avery D. Williams, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Williams had claimed that Arkansas Department of Correction officials violated his constitutional rights and his rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-2000bb-4, by imposing a grooming policy which prohibited Williams — a Rastafarian' — from wearing his hair in “dreadlocks.” We conclude the district court improperly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, as the record demonstrates that Williams’s grievance had been denied by the Warden and the Assistant Director at the time the court ruled. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to allow Williams an opportunity to proceed on his claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avery Williams v. Larry Norris, 176 F.3d 1089 (8th Cir. 1999).

176 F.3d 1089 (Avery Williams v. Larry Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Norris
176 F.3d 1089 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)