Williams v. Merritt
This text of 469 F. App'x 270 (Williams v. Merritt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Cleaven L. Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Bartee, No. 1:10-cv-00935-CCB, 2011 WL 1230814 (D.Md. Mar. 28, 2011); 2011 WL 2842367 (Jul. 14, 2011).
AFFIRMED.
We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Claim V on the ground that Williams failed to offer any evidence, apart from his own bald and conclusory allegations, to support his claims. See Erwin v. United States, 591 F.3d 313, 319-20 (4th Cir.2010) (noting that mere conclusory allegations are insufficient to support the nonmoving party’s case).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F. App'x 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-merritt-ca4-2012.