Williams v. Lappin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7813

MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARLEY G. LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; B. G. COMPTON; JERRY JONES; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER STORY; G. COOPER; OFFICER GIDDINS; OFFICER MOLLICA; JESSICA JONES; OFFICER TORRES; OFFICER BOURQUE; C/O FLANARY; OFFICER JOHNSON; OFFICER ELDRIDGE; OFFICER MARQUES; HARRELL WATTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-625-7)

Submitted: March 28, 2005 Decided: April 29, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Lappin,

No. CA-04-625-7 (W.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2004; entered Oct. 27,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 2 -