Williams v. Lappin
This text of Williams v. Lappin (Williams v. Lappin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7813
MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HARLEY G. LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; B. G. COMPTON; JERRY JONES; OFFICER STRICKLAND; OFFICER STORY; G. COOPER; OFFICER GIDDINS; OFFICER MOLLICA; JESSICA JONES; OFFICER TORRES; OFFICER BOURQUE; C/O FLANARY; OFFICER JOHNSON; OFFICER ELDRIDGE; OFFICER MARQUES; HARRELL WATTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-625-7)
Submitted: March 28, 2005 Decided: April 29, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Lappin,
No. CA-04-625-7 (W.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2004; entered Oct. 27,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Lappin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-lappin-ca4-2005.