Williams v. . Harper

4 N.C. 284
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 N.C. 284 (Williams v. . Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. . Harper, 4 N.C. 284 (N.C. 1816).

Opinion

The judge granted a new trial, upon the plaintiff's paying all the costs, from which order, as to the costs, he appealed to this Court.

The case was submitted. The Court cannot perceive, in the order appealed from, anything unusual or improper, for it seems to them perfectly reasonable that the plaintiff should pay the costs of the nonsuit, occasioned solely by his absence when the cause was called. If upon the mere motion of the party a new trial could be had under such circumstances, a great *Page 220 portion of the time of the court would be consumed in awarding nonsuits and restraining causes; for that sort of punctuality required from suitors, and which is so necessary to the regular dispatch of business, cannot well be enforced unless the neglect of it be attended with some inconvenience and loss. When, therefore, an indulgence is asked of the court which involves a loss of the public time and occasions inconvenience to the adverse party, it should be granted only on the payment of the costs.

(285) Affirmed.

SEAWELL, J., gave no opinion.

NOTE. — See Sheppard v. Salter, 1 N.C. 40; Reynolds v. Boyd,23 N.C. 106.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheppard v. . Salter
1 N.C. 78 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1796)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-harper-nc-1816.