Sheppard v. . Salter

1 N.C. 78
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1796
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 78 (Sheppard v. . Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheppard v. . Salter, 1 N.C. 78 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

Opinion

He afterwards offered an affidavit that one of his witnesses, by whose testimony he would have been able to prove a reassumption within three years, was at his counsel's elbow a little before the cause came on, but was out of the courthouse at the time he was called. Whereupon he prayed that the nonsuit be set aside.

The Court said he ought to have prayed a continuance.

But on his observing that he had thought that by going to trial and satisfying the Court, by the testimony of a witness who attended, that he had a good cause of action, and that he failed only on the proof of a reassumption: the justice of the case being on his side, he would appear entitled to the favor he prayed. Let the nonsuit be set aside, on payment of full costs.

McCOY, J., tacente. NOTE. — See Williams v. Harper, 4 N.C. 284; Reynolds v. Boyd,23 N.C. 106. *Page 81

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. . Harper
4 N.C. 284 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)
Reynolds v. . Boyd
23 N.C. 106 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheppard-v-salter-ncsuperct-1796.