Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co.
361 S.E.2d 199, 184 Ga. App. 239, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196
Opinion
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court violated OCGA § 9-10-182 by allowing two attorneys to argue for the defendant during closing argument. Both the plaintiff and the defendant employed double counsel. One attorney for the plaintiff began closing argument; the two defense attorneys then argued; and the plaintiff’s second attorney concluded the argument. Under Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga. App. 339 (280 SE2d 386) (1981), this procedure did not violate OCGA § 9-10-182.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co., 361 S.E.2d 199, 184 Ga. App. 239, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).
361 S.E.2d 199 (Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheriff v. State
587 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)