Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co.

361 S.E.2d 199, 184 Ga. App. 239, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 8, 1987
Docket74954
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 361 S.E.2d 199 (Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co., 361 S.E.2d 199, 184 Ga. App. 239, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court violated OCGA § 9-10-182 by allowing two attorneys to argue for the defendant during closing argument. Both the plaintiff and the defendant employed double counsel. One attorney for the plaintiff began closing argument; the two defense attorneys then argued; and the plaintiff’s second attorney concluded the argument. Under Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga. App. 339 (280 SE2d 386) (1981), this procedure did not violate OCGA § 9-10-182.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheriff v. State
587 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 S.E.2d 199, 184 Ga. App. 239, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-greenfield-equipment-co-gactapp-1987.