Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Taylor v. Powell

Taylor v. Powell

280 S.E.2d 336, 158 Ga. App. 339, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 22, 1981
Docket61651
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 280 S.E.2d 336 (Taylor v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Powell, 280 S.E.2d 336, 158 Ga. App. 339, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this appeal, alleging that the trial court, in violation of Code Ann. § 81-1004, permitted more than one counsel to speak on behalf of the defendants in closing argument.

The evidence shows that counsel for the plaintiffs made the concluding argument. No violation of Code Ann. § 81-1004 thus appears. See Duke v. Steed, 127 Ga. App. 541 (194 SE2d 257).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheriff v. State
587 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Steverson v. Eason
390 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co.
361 S.E.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Goforth v. Wigley
343 S.E.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 S.E.2d 336, 158 Ga. App. 339, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-powell-gactapp-1981.