Williams v. Envelope Transit Corp.

186 A.D.2d 797, 589 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12300
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 26, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 797 (Williams v. Envelope Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Envelope Transit Corp., 186 A.D.2d 797, 589 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Huttner, J.), dated November 27, 1990, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

On the night of August 27, 1987, the plaintiff was driving his vehicle on the Manhattan Bridge when he noticed that a taxi, owned by the defendant Envelope Transit Corp. and operated by the defendant Yves St. Pierre, had stalled in the left lane. The plaintiff stopped his car behind the taxi and walked over to it. He spoke to St. Pierre and, after determining that he could not render any assistance, he returned to his [798]*798car and got in. Immediately thereafter, a car driven by the third-party defendant Richard Tauber hydroplaned on the slightly wet pavement and ran into the rear of the plaintiffs car, causing it to go forward and strike the taxi. On this record, the court erred in denying the motion for summary judgment brought on by the defendants. While the stalling of the defendants’ taxi may have furnished the occasion for the accident, it was not one of its causes (see, Rogers v Huggins, 106 AD2d 621, 622; see also, Benyarko v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 AD2d 572; see also, Dunlap v City of New York, 186 AD2d 782 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kante v. Tong Fei Chen
2019 NY Slip Op 7390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Littles v. Yorkshire Business Corp.
114 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Lee v. D. Daniels Contracting, Ltd.
113 A.D.3d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Jablonski v. Jakaitis
85 A.D.3d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Peralta v. Manzo
74 A.D.3d 1307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Pironti v. Leary
42 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Wechter v. Kelner
40 A.D.3d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Remy v. City of New York
36 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Schiff v. Possemato
25 A.D.3d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Ely v. Pierce
302 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Katz v. Klagsbrun
299 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Panico v. Key Food Stores Cooperative, Inc.
275 A.D.2d 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ortiz v. Jimtion Food Corp.
274 A.D.2d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Hoenig v. Park Royal Owners Inc.
249 A.D.2d 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Feehan v. Hong-Suh Park
248 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Esposito v. Rea
243 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Mikelinich v. R. A. Giovannetti
239 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Hersman v. Hadley
235 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Gleason v. Reynolds Leasing Corp.
227 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 797, 589 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-envelope-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1992.