Feehan v. Hong-Suh Park

248 A.D.2d 430, 668 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2323
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Shirley Feehan appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated January 23, 1997, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendants’ counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs motion is granted, and the defendants’ counterclaim is dismissed.

It is undisputed that the defendants’ vehicle backed into the appellant’s vehicle which was parked in a parking lot. However, contrary to the defendants’ contention and the Supreme Court’s conclusion, we find that there is insufficient evidence in the record to raise an issue of fact whether the appellant was parked in an illegal location. Moreover, even if the appellant were parked in an illegal location, this merely would have furnished the condition for the occurrence of the accident. It would not have been one of its causes (see, Esposito v Rea, 243 AD2d 536; Dunlap v City of New York, 186 AD2d 782; Williams v Envelope Tr. Corp., 186 AD2d 797). Thus, the defendants’ counterclaim asserting that the appellant was contributorily negligent should have been dismissed.

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feehan v. Hong-Suh Park, 248 A.D.2d 430, 668 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 430 (Feehan v. Hong-Suh Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilmore v. Ritchie
260 A.D.2d 347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)