Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided May 8, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00027·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:23-cv-27-MOC TANYA WILLIAMS, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) Defendant. ) □ ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s Consent Motion for Remand to Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 5). Plaintiff has consented to this motion. ORDER IT IS HEREBY, ORDERED that Defendant’s Consent Motion for Remand to Social Security Administration, (Doc. No. 5), is GRANTED, and pursuant to the power of this Court to, upon motion of the Commissioner made for good cause shown before the Commissioner files her answer, remand Social Security cases for further action under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant’s motion, with Plaintiffs consent, to remand this case for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). May 8, 2023

orton <. Max O. Cogburn i ,) LIlnited States Diietrict Tndoe "kl

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security (Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)