Williams v. Bradfield

53 S.E. 312, 124 Ga. 1003, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 685
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pisii, O. J.

As the answer to the writ of certiorari sued out in the present, ease did not verify the statement in the petition for certiorari, that, a verdict had been rendered against the petitioner in the court wherein the ease originated, nor disclose what, if any, disposition was made of the ease in that court, and as no steps were taken to have the answer perfected, the judge of the superior court, who overruled the petition for certiorari, committed no error of which the petitioner could legally complain.. Garrett v. McIntosh, 116 Ga. 911; Stephens v. Macon, 120 Ga. 482.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Bradfield, 53 S.E. 312, 124 Ga. 1003, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 685 (Ga. 1906).

53 S.E. 312 (Williams v. Bradfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manning v. Mayor of Gainesville
53 S.E. 1002 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)