Williams v. Bradfield
This text of 53 S.E. 312 (Williams v. Bradfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the answer to the writ of certiorari sued out in the present, ease did not verify the statement in the petition for certiorari, that, a verdict had been rendered against the petitioner in the court wherein the ease originated, nor disclose what, if any, disposition was made of the ease in that court, and as no steps were taken to have the answer perfected, the judge of the superior court, who overruled the petition for certiorari, committed no error of which the petitioner could legally complain.. Garrett v. McIntosh, 116 Ga. 911; Stephens v. Macon, 120 Ga. 482.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 S.E. 312, 124 Ga. 1003, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bradfield-ga-1906.