Garrett v. McIntosh

43 S.E. 260, 116 Ga. 911, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 113
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 9, 1903·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The magistrate’s answer to the writ of certiorari sued out in the present case did not verify the statement in the plaintiff’s petition that a verdict and judgment were rendered against him in the court in which the case originated, or disclose what disposition (if any) was made of the case in that court. The judge of the superior court had, therefore, no jurisdiction to sustain the certiorari. Stoner v. Magins, 116 Ga. 797, this term.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garrett v. McIntosh, 43 S.E. 260, 116 Ga. 911, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 113 (Ga. 1903).

43 S.E. 260 (Garrett v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eslinger v. Flynn
164 S.E. 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Manning v. Mayor of Gainesville
53 S.E. 1002 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Williams v. Bradfield
53 S.E. 312 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)