Williams v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TP. OF DEPTFORD
This text of 486 A.2d 846 (Williams v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TP. OF DEPTFORD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 192 N.J.Super. 31 (1983). The dissenting opinion below did not address the Appellate Division majority’s dictum that the Board of Education should be permitted to recoup moneys paid to appellant because of an erroneous interpretation of N.J.S.A. 18A:30-2.1. That issue is therefore not before us, see R. 2:2-1(a)(2), and we express no view on it.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 A.2d 846, 98 N.J. 319, 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-bd-of-educ-of-tp-of-deptford-nj-1985.