Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2010·No. 10-1237·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1237

RANDY WILLIAMS; MARY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

APAC ATLANTIC, INC.; APAC, INC.; APAC CAROLINA INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:08-cv-03432-JFA)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Williams, Mary Williams, Appellants Pro Se. Clayton Monroe Custer, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court’s

order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the

Williams’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs’

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.,

No. 3:08-cv-03432-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., (4th Cir. 2010).

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc. (Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.