Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.

384 F. App'x 264

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2010·No. No. 10-1237·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the Williams’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., No. [265]*2653:08-cv-03432-JFA, 2010 WL 569735 (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the Williams’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., No. [265]*2653:08-cv-03432-JFA, 2010 WL 569735 (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., 384 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

384 F. App'x 264 (Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.