Williams Farms Produce Sales, Inc. v. R & G Produce Company
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00389-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
WILLIAMS FARMS PRODUCE SALES, INC., Appellant, v.
R & G PRODUCE COMPANY, Appellee.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Williams Farms Produce Sales Inc., seeks to appeal from the trial court’s entry of a contempt order. Appellee, R&G Produce Co., has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. We agree with appellee. See In re Office of AG, 215 S.W.3d 913, 916 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (“A contempt judgment may be attacked by a petition for writ of habeas
corpus (if the contemnor is confined) or a petition for writ of mandamus (if no confinement is involved); however, because a contempt order is not a final judgment, a remedy by appeal does not lie.”) (citations omitted); see also Beeler v. Fuqua, 351 S.W.3d 428, 433-34 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011, pet. denied) (“A contempt order must be challenged in an original proceeding.”).
Because we do not have jurisdiction to consider appellant’s complaint regarding the contempt order by appeal, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 12th day of July, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams Farms Produce Sales, Inc. v. R & G Produce Company (Williams Farms Produce Sales, Inc. v. R & G Produce Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.