William White v. Polk County Attorney's Office
This text of 670 F. App'x 902 (William White v. Polk County Attorney's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William White appeals after the district court 1 dismissed his action seeking a ruling that his 1985 state-court conviction was void. In the district court, he sought a writ of coram nobis, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651.
*903 Upon careful de novo review, see Adams v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 813 F.3d 1151, 1154 (8th Cir. 2016), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Because White was challenging a state-court judgment, the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant a writ of coram nobis. See Finkelstein v. Spitzer, 455 F.3d 131, 133-34 (2d Cir. 2006) (per curiam). In addition, White could not invoke section 1651 as an independent source of jurisdiction. See Ark. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Little Rock Cardiology Clinic, P.A., 551 F.3d 812, 820-21 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-white-v-polk-county-attorneys-office-ca8-2016.