William S. Harlow v. United States Postal Service

73 F.3d 376, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40617, 1995 WL 656817

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 23, 1995·No. 95-3798·Published

Opinion

73 F.3d 376
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

William S. HARLOW, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-3798.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 23, 1995.

ORDER

Petitioner having paid the required filing fee, it is ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner's brief is due on or before December 22, 1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William S. HARLOW, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-3798.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 23, 1995.

ORDER

Petitioner having paid the required filing fee, it is ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner's brief is due on or before December 22, 1995.

William S. Harlow v. United States Postal Service, 73 F.3d 376, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40617, 1995 WL 656817 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

Pincite

73 F.3d 376 (William S. Harlow v. United States Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.