William S. Harlow v. United States Postal Service
This text of 69 F.3d 554 (William S. Harlow v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
69 F.3d 554
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
William S. HARLOW, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 95-3798.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1995.
68 M.S.P.R. 444.
PETITION DISMISSED.
ORDER
The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is
ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 F.3d 554, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36009, 1995 WL 616506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-s-harlow-v-united-states-postal-service-cafc-1995.