William Pledger, III v. Marty Anderson
This text of 416 F. App'x 580 (William Pledger, III v. Marty Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Pledger appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Pledger filed his petition in January 2009, while confined at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, 1 arguing that his confinement pursuant to a *581 2004 commitment order entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas was unlawful because the commitment proceedings did not comply with 18 U.S.C. § 4246. In dismissing Pledger’s petition, the district court held that issues related to Pledger’s commitment needed to be resolved in the committing court, as it was in the best position to evaluate the merits of Pledger’s argument that the commitment order was invalid.
Upon review, we reverse the dismissal order, and we remand the case to the district court with instructions to transfer the case to the Eastern District of Arkansas “in the interest of justice.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (district court may transfer to cure venue defect “if it be in the interest of justice”); Archuleta v. Hedrick, 365 F.3d 644, 649 (8th Cir.2004).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
. Pledger was subsequently transferred to the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 F. App'x 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-pledger-iii-v-marty-anderson-ca8-2011.